[Imc-sydney] Re: [Imc-sydney-content] Hidden <em>comment</em>.

[diet simon]

I disagree with hiding this.

Let whoever wants to flame, flame about this. It will soon flame itself out. 
Those bored by the flaming will just flip past it, like I do with newspaper 
pages or radio programmes that bore me.

On the other hand, I'd like to hear criticism of site handling. It's like 
flagging any trend to autocracy and against pluralism in parts of the IMC 
movement.

Diet


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <imc-sydney at indymedia.org.au>
To: <imc-sydney-content at indymedia.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:53 AM
Subject: [Imc-sydney-content] Hidden <em>comment</em>.


> Please note: this list is archived and searchable via the web.
> Hidden <em>comment</em>.
> Title: Australian Indymedia is already censored
> By: cam
> Reason: Flame bait
> http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/are-you-happy-government-censor-our-internet#comment-71866
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-sydney-content mailing list
> Imc-sydney-content at indymedia.org.au
> http://lists.indymedia.org.au/mailman/listinfo/imc-sydney-content
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 
> 269.17.12/1203 - Release Date: 30/12/2007 11:27 AM
>
>