[Imc-oceania] aotearoa imc collective decision

[and]

Can we please abide by the previous decision that discussions  
regarding darwin are not to occur on this list?
As far as I recall only announcements of decisions people thought the  
entire network need know were to be permitted.
And.


On 13/08/2006, at 6:13 PM, rosyposy wrote:

> Please note: this list is archived and searchable via the web.
> excuse me, but i think you'll find that the aotearoa imc decision  
> was to purge all the abusive posts from our database!  this is not  
> a decision taken lightly - it was because of the severity of the  
> abuse that we felt it necessary to take this measure.  considering  
> the amount of unnecessary and totally uncalled for abuse coming  
> especially from mick lambe - often targetting people who have  
> absolutely nothing to do with the matter - i hardly think the  
> matter is near resolution.
>
> silence is not assent!
> is this what the torrent of bullyish abuse is trying to achieve?   
> an illusion of assent?
>
> no way.
>
> .rosie
> as a a-imc volunteer, and an individual
>
>
>> Please note: this list is archived and searchable via the web.
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>>
>> Hi All,
>>           it is reasonable for Mick's response to Aotearoa's email  
>> to be seen on this list - it's appended to this. I think it is  
>> clearly time for the DIM debacle to be rectified once and for all  
>> - so I would encourage all interested parties to work towards  
>> that. Most seem to agree this whole thing is a drain. Most seem to  
>> agree that the DIMC should have their URL returned. Can we  
>> *please* just get it done so we can move on and get on with  
>> improving Indymedia.
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>>
>> as sydney, NZ. adelaide and even an unafilliated collective have  
>> decided not to interfere with the return of our domain - and perth  
>> also have no wish to interfere - why is discussion still censored  
>> on the oceania list as to why our domain has not been returned?
>>
>> Can no-one forward this obvious change in policy by sydney imc -  
>> the initiators of the censorship proposal - to the oceania list?
>>
>> That would be helpful.
>>
>>
>>
>> - mick DIMC
>> ___________
>>
>> */rosyposy <halo at animal-liberation.org.nz>/* wrote:
>>
>>     Please note: this list is archived and searchable via the web.
>>     fyi - aotearoa collective has decided to purge any media  
>> (stories,
>>     comments, pics etc) regarding DIMC et al from our database.
>>
>>     .rosie
>>     aotearoa imc
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Imc-oceania mailing list
>>     Imc-oceania at lists.cat.org.au
>>     http://lists.cat.org.au/mailman/listinfo/imc-oceania
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> On Yahoo!7
>> Answers: Real people ask and answer questions on any topic.  
>> <http://au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tag/**http%3A%2F% 
>> 2Fau.answers.yahoo.com%2F>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Imc-oceania mailing list
>> Imc-oceania at lists.cat.org.au
>> http://lists.cat.org.au/mailman/listinfo/imc-oceania
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-oceania mailing list
> Imc-oceania at lists.cat.org.au
> http://lists.cat.org.au/mailman/listinfo/imc-oceania